🦞 4minAI.com
1 / 12
Day 8 of 20 Β· AI for Recruitment

Outreach Messages That Get Replies

You've found the perfect candidate. Their LinkedIn profile is a dream match for your role. You craft a message, hit send, and... nothing. No reply. No view. Just silence.

Sound familiar? The average InMail response rate is around 10-25%. That means for every 10 messages you send, 7-9 go unanswered. If you're spending 5 minutes per message, that's a lot of wasted time on messages that never land.

Today you're going to fix that. AI doesn't just make outreach faster β€” it makes it better. Personalized, relevant, and structured in a way that makes candidates actually want to respond.

Why most outreach fails

Before we fix the problem, let's understand it. Most recruiter outreach falls into one of three traps:

The copy-paste trap. "Hi [Name], I came across your profile and was really impressed. I have an exciting opportunity..." Every candidate has received this message 50 times. They can smell a template from the subject line.

The essay trap. Three paragraphs about the company, two paragraphs about the role, one paragraph about the team. The candidate reads the first line, sees a wall of text, and moves on.

The vague trap. "I have a great opportunity that might interest you." What role? What company? What salary? Why should they care? Vague messages get vague results β€” which is no response at all.

What works instead: Short, personalized, specific, and with a clear reason to respond. That's exactly what AI helps you produce at scale.

Knowledge Check
What's the most common reason passive candidates ignore recruiter outreach?
A
They're not interested in changing jobs
B
The message feels generic and templated, with no personalization or specific relevance to their profile
C
They don't check their LinkedIn messages
D
The salary isn't mentioned
Even candidates who are open to new opportunities ignore messages that feel like mass outreach. Personalization is the number one factor in whether someone responds. AI helps you personalize at scale β€” referencing specific skills, experience, or career moves that show you've actually looked at their profile.

The anatomy of a high-response outreach message

After analyzing thousands of successful recruiter messages, a clear structure emerges. The best outreach messages contain these four elements β€” and nothing else:

1. Personal hook (1 sentence) β€” Reference something specific from their profile. Not "I was impressed by your experience" but "I noticed you led the migration from monolith to microservices at Deliveroo β€” that's exactly the challenge we're solving." This proves you've looked at their profile.

2. The opportunity (2-3 sentences) β€” What's the role, who's the company (or describe it if confidential), and what makes it interesting? Be specific: "Series B fintech, 80 people, building the payments infrastructure for Southeast Asia. They need a VP of Engineering to scale the team from 15 to 40 over the next year."

3. Why them specifically (1 sentence) β€” Connect their experience to the role. "Your experience scaling engineering teams at a similar stage β€” and your payments background β€” makes you a really strong fit."

4. Easy next step (1 sentence) β€” Make it low-effort to respond. Not "Let's schedule a call" but "Would a 15-minute chat this week be worth it, even just to hear more?" Remove friction.

Total length: 4-6 sentences. That's it. No company history. No exhaustive job description. Just enough to get a reply.

Four-element outreach message structure showing personal hook, opportunity, why them, and easy next step
Four elements, 4-6 sentences, dramatically higher response rates.

AI prompt templates for different candidate types

Here are three ready-to-use prompts. Copy these and customize with your details:

For passive senior candidates (directors, VPs, C-suite):

"I'm recruiting for a [title] role at [company description β€” stage, size, what they do]. Here is the candidate's LinkedIn profile summary: [paste key details]. Write a short LinkedIn InMail (4-6 sentences max) that: 1) Opens with something specific from their profile that connects to this role, 2) Describes the opportunity briefly, 3) Explains why they'd be a great fit specifically, 4) Ends with a low-pressure ask for a 15-minute chat. Keep the tone professional but human β€” not corporate or salesy."

For tech candidates (engineers, data scientists, product managers):

"I'm recruiting for a [title] role at [company description]. Tech stack: [list]. Here is the candidate's profile: [paste details]. Write a concise outreach message that: 1) References a specific project or technology from their background, 2) Mentions the technical challenge (not just the job title), 3) Includes one compelling detail about the engineering culture or team, 4) Asks if they'd like to hear more. Keep it under 5 sentences. Engineers prefer brevity."

For career changers or adjacent candidates:

"I'm reaching out to someone whose background is in [their current field] for a role in [target field]. Their profile: [paste details]. Write a message that: 1) Acknowledges their current expertise, 2) Connects transferable skills to the new role, 3) Explains why their different background is actually an advantage, 4) Keeps the tone encouraging and curious. Under 5 sentences."

πŸ€–
ChatGPT
online
I'm recruiting a Head of Product for a Series B healthtech startup, 120 people, building AI-powered diagnostics. Here's the candidate's LinkedIn summary: "VP Product at Babylon Health (2020-2024). Led product team of 12. Launched symptom checker used by 5M users. Previously PM at Google Health. Background in biomedical engineering." Write the InMail.
Hi Sarah, Your work launching Babylon's symptom checker to 5M users caught my attention β€” particularly given your biomedical engineering background. Not many product leaders combine deep health domain expertise with that scale of consumer product delivery. I'm working with a Series B healthtech startup (120 people) that's building AI-powered diagnostics. They're looking for a Head of Product to own the roadmap as they scale from early traction to market leadership. The founding team is ex-DeepMind, and the clinical validation data is genuinely impressive. Given your Babylon and Google Health experience, you'd be walking into a role where your exact skillset is the bottleneck they need to unlock. Would a 15-minute call this week be worth it, even just to hear more about what they're building?
↻ Replay conversation
Knowledge Check
Why should outreach messages be kept to 4-6 sentences maximum?
A
LinkedIn has a character limit on InMails
B
Busy candidates scan messages quickly β€” short, specific messages are more likely to be read fully and get a response
C
Longer messages are flagged as spam
D
Shorter messages look more professional
Senior, in-demand candidates receive dozens of recruiter messages. They don't read essays β€” they scan. A message that's 4-6 sentences, with a personal hook and a clear opportunity, gets read. A message that's three paragraphs long gets skimmed or ignored.

The 30-second personalisation check

AI gives you a strong 90% draft. Your job is the final 10%. Before sending any AI-generated outreach:

Check the personal hook. Does it reference something genuinely specific about this candidate? Not just their job title, but a project, an achievement, or a career move that's relevant to the role. If the hook could apply to anyone with a similar title, make it more specific.

Check the tone. Does it sound like you? If you're naturally casual, soften any stiff language. If you're more formal, tighten it up. Candidates respond to humans, not robots.

Verify the facts. Make sure AI hasn't assumed anything about the candidate that isn't in their profile. Don't claim they "led a team of 50" if their profile says "managed a team."

Check the ask. Is the next step genuinely easy? "Would a 15-minute chat be worth it?" is better than "Are you available for a call at 2pm on Thursday?" Remove friction.

Knowledge Check
After AI generates an outreach message, what's the most important thing to verify?
A
That the company description is detailed enough
B
That the message is exactly 5 sentences long
C
That the personal hook references something genuinely specific about this candidate, not something generic that could apply to anyone
D
That the grammar is correct
The personal hook is what separates a message that gets a reply from one that gets ignored. If the hook could apply to anyone with the same job title, it's not personal enough. AI sometimes defaults to generic observations β€” your job is to make sure the hook is truly specific to this individual.

Scaling outreach without losing quality

Here's the workflow that lets you send 20-30 personalized messages per day in under an hour:

1. Batch your sourcing. Identify 20-30 candidates in one sitting. Copy their key profile details into a simple list.

2. Run them through AI. For each candidate, paste their details into your prompt template. AI generates the message in 10-15 seconds.

3. Quick review and send. Scan each message, tweak the hook if needed, and send. With practice, each message takes 30-60 seconds to review and send.

The maths: 30 messages Γ— 1 minute each = 30 minutes. At a 20% response rate, that's 6 conversations started. Compare that to manually writing each message at 5 minutes each β€” 2.5 hours for the same result.

πŸ‘₯
Day 8 Complete
"Personal hook, specific opportunity, clear connection, easy next step. AI writes it in seconds β€” you personalise it in 30. That's outreach at scale."
Tomorrow β€” Day 9
Scheduling Without the Back-and-Forth
Tomorrow you'll tackle every recruiter's biggest time sink β€” scheduling β€” with AI-powered templates and workflows that eliminate the back-and-forth.
πŸ”₯1
1 day streak!